nanog mailing list archives

Re: Internet2

From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:22:59 -0400


On Apr 26, 2005, at 5:17 PM, Daniel Roesen wrote:

On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 02:07:15PM -0700, Vicky Rode wrote:

Basically I meant to say not congested as the current Internet is.


It is?


Parts.

Other parts have better connectivity than I2 nodes.

You can't really say anything about the _entire_ Internet.

--
TTFN,
patrick

Current thread:

Internet2 Vicky Rode (Apr 26)
- Re: Internet2 Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 26)
  - Re: Internet2 Scott Call (Apr 26)
  - Re: Internet2 Vicky Rode (Apr 26)
    - Re: Internet2 Daniel Roesen (Apr 26)
    - Re: Internet2 Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 26)
    - Re: Internet2 Vicky Rode (Apr 26)
    - Re: Internet2 Randy Bush (Apr 26)
    - Re: Internet2 Vicky Rode (Apr 26)
    - Re: Internet2 Randy Bush (Apr 27)
    - Message not available
    - Re: Internet2 Randy Bush (Apr 27)
    - Re: Internet2 Dan Hollis (Apr 27)
    - Re: Internet2 Florian Weimer (Apr 27)
    - Re: Internet2 Vicky Rode (Apr 29)
    - Re: Internet2 Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 26)
    - Re: Internet2 Adam McKenna (Apr 26)

(Thread continues...)