nanog mailing list archives
Re: AUP for NANOG?
From: Romain Komorn <rkomorn () globat com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:14:30 -0700
I'm at a bit of a loss trying to understand how bashing other lists constitutes an improvement on bashing other members of the NANOG list.
I think the point of Matthew's email was that no one really cares for the bash fests, regardless of who it targets, be it on list, or off list.
Personally, having joined NANOG a couple of months ago, I've been much more taken aback by the amount of off topic griping about each other or about whoever decides whatever somewhere, than I have been impressed by the amount of useful information to be gleaned from people's posts.
I hadn't ever really planned on joining the post list to be able to send something to the list. I'm a little disappointed that my first urge to post has come from being tired of off-topic rants more than wanting to contribute something useful to the list.
Romain Komorn Web Hosting Made Easy http://www.Globat.com/ Randy Bush wrote:
This reminds me of the way others behaved when I entered the field some 25 years ago. Some people were very helpful and friendly. Others responded very arrogantly with the tone of "how stupid you are for asking that question."I didn't know you read misc () openbsd org or questions () freebsd org ... :)you wanna see bad second grade playground behavior, try the asterisk mailing list. randy
Current thread:
- AUP for NANOG? Matthew Black (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Randy Bush (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Edward Lewis (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Chris Kuethe (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Randy Bush (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Romain Komorn (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Scott Grayban (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Bill Nash (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Steve Gibbard (Apr 14)
- Message not available
- Best Practices Knowledge Capture (was: Re: AUP for NANOG?) Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 15)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Randy Bush (Apr 14)
- Comment for new folks and posting [was: AUP for NANOG?] Scott Weeks (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Per Gregers Bilse (Apr 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: AUP for NANOG? Hannigan, Martin (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Gregory Hicks (Apr 15)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? John Dupuy (Apr 15)