nanog mailing list archives
Re: The power of default configurations
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 04:39:43 +0000 (GMT)
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
but that was five years ago. Have manufacturers *really* not made that item a default by now? Have providers *really* not changed out that
yes, they really haven't :( more people ought to reference RFC3871 in their RFP's and stop accepting sub-standard equipment? ..dreams...
equipment in five years? I mean, this is internet time, right?
Yes, reference bubble-bursting, reference '100% growth of bandwidth each year' misrepresentations... backbone/network/company consolidations... oh well.
Current thread:
- Re: The power of default configurations, (continued)
- Re: The power of default configurations Petri Helenius (Apr 07)
- Re: The power of default configurations Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 07)
- Re: The power of default configurations Randy Bush (Apr 07)
- Re: The power of default configurations Michael . Dillon (Apr 08)
- Re: The power of default configurations Simon Waters (Apr 08)
- Re: The power of default configurations Duane Wessels (Apr 08)
- Port 0 traffic Sean Donelan (Apr 08)
- Re: Port 0 traffic Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 08)
- Re: The power of default configurations Sean Donelan (Apr 10)
- Message not available
- Re: The power of default configurations Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 10)
- Re: The power of default configurations Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 10)