Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND

[Paul Wouters <paul () xtdnet nl>]

On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

> > Just wondering how many have transitioned to djbdns from bind
>
> If transitioning from BIND, why go to the non-free and non-compliant
> djbdns instead of nsd (http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/)?

I couldn't agree more. At least BIND9 and NSD both support RFC 4035,
and I am getting tired of hearing about these cache poisoning hypes
lately.

Last one to secure his zone is a luser :)

Paul