Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND

[Niek <niek () asbak coding-slaves com>]

On 4/9/2005 3:46 AM +0100, Nathan Ward wrote:
> I had a play with DJBDNS after using BIND for years. Here's why I 
> switched back:
> - No AXFR support
It supports this.
> - No TCP support
It supports this.
> - I was forced to use DJBs naming conventions for zones
If you administer 2-3 domains, sure it's an hassle, if not, put code-monkeys
to work. Most script people I know love the tinydns zone structure in comparison
to bind's one.
> - Licensing
I agree here.
> - Installation
A no-brainer.

Niek Baakman
--