Re: The power of default configurations

[Paul Vixie <paul () vix com>]

> IMO, RFC1918 went off the track when both ISP's and registries started
> asking their customers if they have "seriously considered using 1918 space
> instead of applying for addresses". This caused many kinds of renumbering
> nightmares, overlapping addresses, near death of ipv6, etc.

just checking... does that mean you favour the one-prefix-per-asn implicit
allocation model, or the ipv6 version of 1918 which intentionally doesn't
overlap in order to serve inter-enterprise links, or what exactly?