nanog mailing list archives
Re: PAIX Outages
From: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa () samurai sfo dead-dog com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:13:54 -0700
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 01:51:54PM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Personally I tend to suspect the general lack of uproar is a rather unfortunate (for them) sign that PAIX is no longer relevant when it comes to critical backbone infrastructures.
I'm not so sure you can draw that conclusion. At this point, everyone's high traffic peers are private interconnects anyway. The site is likely more important to them than the public fabric within the site. A facility power outage would probably be a lot more painful than some public fabric issues. Any traffic that works its way down to a public fabric probably has other public fabrics to go to as well. --msa
Current thread:
- Re: PAIX Outages, (continued)
- Re: PAIX Outages Randy Bush (Apr 27)
- Re: PAIX Outages Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 28)
- Re: PAIX Outages Leo Bicknell (Apr 28)
- Re: PAIX Outages Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 28)
- Re: PAIX Outages Alexander Koch (Apr 28)
- RE: PAIX Outages Neil J. McRae (Apr 29)
- Re: PAIX Outages Alexander Koch (Apr 29)
- Re: PAIX Outages Daniel Roesen (Apr 29)
- RE: PAIX Outages Neil J. McRae (Apr 29)
- Re: PAIX Outages Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 29)
- Re: PAIX Outages Leo Bicknell (Apr 28)
- Re: PAIX Outages Alexander Koch (Apr 29)