Re: Email Complexes

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis () kurtis pp se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-09-15, at 00.48, Joe Abley wrote:
> On 14 Sep 2004, at 17:39, Hosman, Ross wrote:
>
> > Ensuring that email flows freely between our mail complex and other 
> > top mail
> > provider complexes is a support issue correct. Actually setting up the
> > system to monitor and to ensure the support people get the data they 
> > need is
> > operations/engineering.
>
> If getting mail from your mail complex is important to remote mail 
> complex A then talk to remote mail complex A and arrange something. If 
> remote mail complex A doesn't care, or doesn't return your mail, then 
> maybe mail complex A doesn't think your mail complex is worth worrying 
> about (or perhaps you are sufficiently notable that it's worth 
> blocking mail from you without generating bounce complexes).
>
> Unless your mail complex is sufficiently big that remote mail complex 
> A's customers are going to care (i.e. generate support complex load 
> above the noise floor) I wouldn't hold my breath complex waiting for 
> anybody to expend effort to help you with any of this for free.
>
> There isn't really any solution complex you're going to magically find 
> from the NANOG list complex beyond the suggestion complex that has 
> already been put forward (that of purchasing standard retail pop3 
> mailbox complexes from the other provider complexes you're interested 
> in, and running text complexes between them and your mail complex.)

This is just way to complex for me.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBQUfrZaarNKXTPFCVEQJh+wCfVVIlMV9TNIKzz3UuzeAJuzupVSkAnjW5
KFEaZxXJ5j1y4iR/P/k8OvhW
=Lg2S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----