nanog mailing list archives

RE: ISP Policies


From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 05:10:21 +0000 (GMT)



On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Michel Py wrote:


Tulip Rasputin wrote:
Do the ISPs ever look for some particular AS number in the BGP
AS_PATH and then decide what action/preference/priority they
need to take/give based on the AS number(s) present in the BGP
AS_PATH_SEQ/SET?


If there is a question that nobody here wants to answer, this would be
it.

Short answer:
Publicly: No, heaven forbid. I'll just let BGP do its job.
Privately: Hell yes.

I'm not a router guy (routing atleast), but perhaps there are performance
problems inside an ASN along a path which you connect to other places? So
you might lengthen paths through/to that ASN to force traffic across
another ASN's direct connection which is less problematic?

Or, you just don't want to send traffic through Bill Manning's ASN because
you dislike his hawiian T-Shirt Policy? There are probably a few hundred
reasosn why you'd avoid an ASN... In general though I'd think that like
Michel said: "It's a pain and its doing something that bgp should do for
you without lots of messing about"



Current thread: