nanog mailing list archives
RE: ISP Policies
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 05:10:21 +0000 (GMT)
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Michel Py wrote:
Tulip Rasputin wrote: Do the ISPs ever look for some particular AS number in the BGP AS_PATH and then decide what action/preference/priority they need to take/give based on the AS number(s) present in the BGP AS_PATH_SEQ/SET?If there is a question that nobody here wants to answer, this would be it. Short answer: Publicly: No, heaven forbid. I'll just let BGP do its job. Privately: Hell yes.
I'm not a router guy (routing atleast), but perhaps there are performance problems inside an ASN along a path which you connect to other places? So you might lengthen paths through/to that ASN to force traffic across another ASN's direct connection which is less problematic? Or, you just don't want to send traffic through Bill Manning's ASN because you dislike his hawiian T-Shirt Policy? There are probably a few hundred reasosn why you'd avoid an ASN... In general though I'd think that like Michel said: "It's a pain and its doing something that bgp should do for you without lots of messing about"
Current thread:
- ISP Policies Tulip Rasputin (Sep 08)
- Re: ISP Policies bmanning (Sep 08)
- Re: ISP Policies Tulip Rasputin (Sep 08)
- Re: ISP Policies Jeff Kell (Sep 08)
- Re: ISP Policies Peter Wohlers (Sep 09)
- Re: ISP Policies Tulip Rasputin (Sep 08)
- Re: ISP Policies william(at)elan.net (Sep 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: ISP Policies Michel Py (Sep 08)
- RE: ISP Policies Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 08)
- Re: ISP Policies Tulip Rasputin (Sep 08)
- Re: ISP Policies Howard C. Berkowitz (Sep 09)
- Re: ISP Policies Stefan Mink (Sep 10)
- RE: ISP Policies Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 08)
- Re: ISP Policies bmanning (Sep 08)
- RE: ISP Policies Michel Py (Sep 08)
- Re: ISP Policies Rohit Gupta (Sep 09)
- Re: ISP Policies James (Sep 09)
- Re: ISP Policies Edward B. Dreger (Sep 12)
- Re: Re: ISP Policies Rohit Gupta (Sep 09)