nanog mailing list archives
Re: XP SP2 other than windows update
From: Roland Perry <lists () internetpolicyagency com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 19:07:55 +0100
In article <e67acfd604090109493a88a577 () mail gmail com>, Steven Susbauer <Stupendoussteve () gmail com> writes
That's understandable as they would be blamed if someone downloaded a compromised version (strange how they didn't mind Sp1 mirroring...).
I would have thought that they would have checksummed the file to a known value, so that any kind of corruption during downloading would be detected.
-- Roland Perry
Current thread:
- RE: XP SP2 other than windows update Michel Py (Sep 01)
- Re: XP SP2 other than windows update Roland Perry (Sep 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: XP SP2 other than windows update Hannigan, Martin (Sep 01)
- Re: XP SP2 other than windows update Steven Susbauer (Sep 01)
- RE: XP SP2 other than windows update Hannigan, Martin (Sep 01)
- Re: XP SP2 other than windows update Steven Susbauer (Sep 01)
- Re: XP SP2 other than windows update Roland Perry (Sep 01)
- Re: XP SP2 other than windows update Steven Susbauer (Sep 01)
- RE: XP SP2 other than windows update Michel Py (Sep 01)
- RE: XP SP2 other than windows update Michel Py (Sep 01)
- Re: XP SP2 other than windows update Roland Perry (Sep 01)
- RE: XP SP2 other than windows update Michel Py (Sep 06)
- RE: XP SP2 other than windows update Jim Popovitch (Sep 06)
- RE: XP SP2 other than windows update Thornton (Sep 07)
- Re: XP SP2 other than windows update Matt Ghali (Sep 07)
- RE: XP SP2 other than windows update Jim Popovitch (Sep 06)
- RE: XP SP2 other than windows update J. Oquendo (Sep 07)