nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spammers Skirt IP Authentication Attempts
From: abuse () cabal org uk (Peter Corlett)
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 12:04:45 +0000 (UTC)
Henry Linneweh <hrlinneweh () sbcglobal net> wrote:
This is not a good beginning http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1642848,00.asp
It's a predictable response by the spammers. Did anybody really expect the spammers to go "oh, well, that's it, we'd better shut up shop now"? I'm an advocate of SPF, but not because it's the magic bullet that stops spam. It does however allow innocent domains to say "no, I didn't send that" and thus avoid the double-bounced backwash from a spammer forging their domain as the sender. -- PGP key ID E85DC776 - finger abuse () mooli org uk for full key
Current thread:
- Spammers Skirt IP Authentication Attempts Henry Linneweh (Sep 06)
- Re: Spammers Skirt IP Authentication Attempts Peter Corlett (Sep 06)
- Re: Spammers Skirt IP Authentication Attempts Will Yardley (Sep 06)
- Re: Spammers Skirt IP Authentication Attempts Paul Jakma (Sep 06)
- Re: Spammers Skirt IP Authentication Attempts Stephane Bortzmeyer (Sep 06)
- Re: Spammers Skirt IP Authentication Attempts Edward B. Dreger (Sep 06)
- Re: Spammers Skirt IP Authentication Attempts Tom (UnitedLayer) (Sep 06)
- Re: Spammers Skirt IP Authentication Attempts Paul Jakma (Sep 07)
- Re: Spammers Skirt IP Authentication Attempts Stephane Bortzmeyer (Sep 07)
- Re: Spammers Skirt IP Authentication Attempts Paul Jakma (Sep 07)
- Re: Spammers Skirt IP Authentication Attempts J.D. Falk (Sep 07)
- Re: Spammers Skirt IP Authentication Attempts Tom (UnitedLayer) (Sep 06)
- Re: Spammers Skirt IP Authentication Attempts Paul Vixie (Sep 07)
- Re: Spammers Skirt IP Authentication Attempts Peter Corlett (Sep 06)