nanog mailing list archives
Re: I-D on operational MTU/fragmentation issues in tunneling
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:48:08 -0400
Sabri Berisha wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 11:12:55AM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote: Hi Pekka and others,Please send comments to me by the end of this week, either on- of off-list, as you deem appropriate.With the risk of stating the obvious I would say that normally, PMTUDshould do the trick.
On todays internet everything is more reliable than PMTUD.How about replacing it completely with something more inband, less prone to firewall breakage?
Current thread:
- I-D on operational MTU/fragmentation issues in tunneling Pekka Savola (Oct 11)
- Re: I-D on operational MTU/fragmentation issues in tunneling Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 13)
- Re: I-D on operational MTU/fragmentation issues in tunneling Pekka Savola (Oct 14)
- Re: I-D on operational MTU/fragmentation issues in tunneling Sabri Berisha (Oct 14)
- Re: I-D on operational MTU/fragmentation issues in tunneling Joe Maimon (Oct 14)
- Re: I-D on operational MTU/fragmentation issues in tunneling Sam Stickland (Oct 19)
- Re: I-D on operational MTU/fragmentation issues in tunneling Joe Maimon (Oct 19)
- Re: I-D on operational MTU/fragmentation issues in tunneling Joe Maimon (Oct 14)
- Re: I-D on operational MTU/fragmentation issues in tunneling Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 14)
- Re: I-D on operational MTU/fragmentation issues in tunneling Andre Oppermann (Oct 14)
- Re: I-D on operational MTU/fragmentation issues in tunneling Sabri Berisha (Oct 15)
- Re: I-D on operational MTU/fragmentation issues in tunneling Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: I-D on operational MTU/fragmentation issues in tunneling Joe Maimon (Oct 15)