nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 15:08:39 +0200
On 14-okt-04, at 0:17, Fred Baker wrote:
Trusting the source when it says that its packets aren't evil might be sub-optimal. Evaluation of evilness is best left up to the receiver.
Likely true. Next question is whether the receiver can really determine that in real time. For some things, yes, but for many things it is not as obvious to me.
It would be a very good start not having to receive that which you can identify as something you don't want.
Current thread:
- Re: aggregation & table entries, (continued)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 15)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Paul Vixie (Oct 15)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 15)
- Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems Joe Maimon (Oct 11)
- Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 13)
- Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems Fred Baker (Oct 13)
- Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems Michael . Dillon (Oct 14)
- Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems bmanning (Oct 14)
- Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 14)
- Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems Paul Vixie (Oct 13)
- Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems Randy Bush (Oct 19)
- Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems JP Velders (Oct 20)