nanog mailing list archives
Re: Public Interest Networks (was: Re: Consortium sheds light on dark fiber's potential)
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:40:49 -0500
In message <41A4DF8F.9000701 () ai net>, Deepak Jain writes:
Vicky, I apologize if I am hijacking your thread. Is it just me or does all this talk of Research (and other Public Interest) Networks and logical separation by layer 1/2 leave [everyone] nonplussed? How is logical separation of a network [say via MPLS] much different than using a lambda to do the same thing?
Wearing my researcher hat, the answer depends on what sort of research you're trying to conduct. There are more things to do with a fiber than just running IPv4 over it. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
Current thread:
- Consortium sheds light on dark fiber's potential Vicky (Nov 24)
- Public Interest Networks (was: Re: Consortium sheds light on dark fiber's potential) Deepak Jain (Nov 24)
- Re: Public Interest Networks (was: Re: Consortium sheds light on dark fiber's potential) Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 24)
- Re: Public Interest Networks (was: Re: Consortium sheds light on dark fiber's potential) Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 24)
- Re: Public Interest Networks Vicky (Nov 24)
- Re: Public Interest Networks Deepak Jain (Nov 24)
- Re: Public Interest Networks (try UCLP) Gordon Cook (Nov 24)
- Re: Public Interest Networks (try UCLP) JP Velders (Nov 29)
- Re: Public Interest Networks (was: Re: Consortium sheds light on dark fiber's potential) Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 24)
- Public Interest Networks (was: Re: Consortium sheds light on dark fiber's potential) Deepak Jain (Nov 24)