nanog mailing list archives
Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]]
From: William Allen Simpson <wsimpson () greendragon com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:19:15 -0500
Paul Vixie wrote:
i do. see, that is. because rapid renumbering wasn't a bilateral protocol requirement from day 1, renumbering will always be a crock of swill in ipv6 just as it is in ipv4.
Ahem. On Day 1 -- that is SIP, for (Steve's) "Simpler IP" and my PIPE "Practical IP Extentions" [later BIP for (Bill's) "Better IP"] -- rapid renumbering *was* a protocol requirement! As was IP Mobilityfor those long-lived TCP connections. However, prefixes were always explicitly PI (provider independent). And multi-site enterprises had multiple prefixes within them.
We talked about competition where providers could be switched on time of day with massive competition. Providers hated it (massive competition) and got another model adopted some years later. That model is a crock of swill.... 10 or so years after IPv4 deployment we started IPng. It's been another decade, past time for IPngng, although IPv6 sure hasn't had thedeployment success of IPv4, has it???? ;-)
Have we learned anything in 10+ years? -- William Allen Simpson Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
Current thread:
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]], (continued)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] bmanning (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Paul Vixie (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Paul Vixie (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 23)
- Level 3 NOC information. Majid Farid (Nov 23)
- Re: Level 3 NOC information. Todd Mitchell - lists (Nov 23)
- Re: Level 3 NOC information. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 23)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Paul Vixie (Nov 23)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] William Allen Simpson (Nov 24)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 Paul Vixie (Nov 24)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 Jeroen Massar (Nov 24)
- BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Jeroen Massar (Nov 25)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Owen DeLong (Nov 25)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Ryan O'Connell (Nov 25)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Jeroen Massar (Nov 25)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Martin Hepworth (Nov 25)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Jeroen Massar (Nov 25)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 25)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Jeroen Massar (Nov 25)