nanog mailing list archives

RE: Stupid Ipv6 question...


From: "Scott Morris" <swm () emanon com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:04:19 -0500


Does that mean if we rip them off that we may be prosecuted?

;)

Scott 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of
Kevin Loch
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 1:41 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: Stupid Ipv6 question...


Leo Bicknell wrote:

With the exception of auto-configuration, I have yet to see any
IPv6 gear that cares about prefix length.  Configuring a /1 to a
/128 seems to work just fine.  If anyone knows of gear imposing 
narrower limits on what can be configured I'd be facinated to know 
about them.


64 bit prefixes are the mattress tags of IPv6 interfaces.

--
Kevin Loch



Current thread: