nanog mailing list archives
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
From: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" <miquels () cistron nl>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:40:39 +0000 (UTC)
In article <cistron.1100794375.3557.3.camel () firenze zurich ibm com>, Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org> wrote:
The business case of about 80% of the ISP's is Pr0n & W4R3z (or what spelling is 'in' this year?) But.... it is not illegal to make adverts for say "Downloading the newest movies over a cool 8mbit DSL line". But downloading it itself is of course. Might be analogous to providing a busservice to the crack dealers mansion.
[OT] That depends on the jurisdiction. In many parts of the world, downloading is NOT illegal. But making copyrighted files available for download is illegal (without the proper autorization, ofcourse). Mike.
Current thread:
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Miquel van Smoorenburg (Nov 18)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Jeroen Massar (Nov 18)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Owen DeLong (Nov 18)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Jeroen Massar (Nov 18)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Owen DeLong (Nov 18)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Owen DeLong (Nov 18)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 19)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Jeroen Massar (Nov 19)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Nov 21)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Stephen Sprunk (Nov 19)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 20)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] bmanning (Nov 20)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Jeroen Massar (Nov 18)