nanog mailing list archives

Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested


From: "Paul G" <paul () rusko us>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 19:43:29 -0500



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jørgen Hovland" <jorgen () hovland cx>
To: "Network.Security" <Network.Security () target com>
Cc: <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Network.Security" <Network.Security () target com>


On 2004-11-09-17:10:02, "Network.Security" <Network.Security () target com>
wrote:
We receive a disturbingly large amount of traffic sourced from the 1918
space destined for our network coming from one of our normally
respectable Tier 1 ISP's (three letter acronym, starts with 'M', ends
with 'CI').

This is particularly irritating since we pay for burstable service;
nice
that we are paying for illegitimate traffic to come down our pipes.

Hello. I felt I had to write a small comment to this.

For the record, we use 1918 address range on several of our public routers
meaning you will get legitimate traffic from this address space, atleast
from us unless you are filtering it (which is of course all your
decision).
Filtering any type of traffic at all by a transit provider without the
possibility to remove these filters _could_ be reason enough for us to
terminate the contract with them since we would feel we were not paying
for
real internet connectivity.

funny. you must be talking about a different internet. i hear there have
been 'rumours out on the internets [sic]', maybe i'm just behind the times..
<g>

all jokes aside, 1918 allows for use of 1918 space in a private network or a
'private internet [sic]' comprised of any such number of private networks as
agree to interconnect and cooperate in routing traffic sourced from and
destined to said space. it follows that any 1918-sourced traffic you send me
is illegitimate. out of curiosity, what kind of 'legitimate traffic',
considering i couldn't legitimately reply back, were you speaking of?

p


Current thread: