nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP Exploit

From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis () kurtis pp se>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 10:41:00 +0200


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Now that the firestorm over implementing Md5 has quieted down a bit, is
anybody aware of whether the exploit has been used?
Feel free to reply off list.


Even more interesting, did anyone manage to reproduce it?

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQJdXIKarNKXTPFCVEQJKTwCgmyDLv/H3Ho/iaor6RBAx3Mqy3dMAoPiF
rVKmj6c4p/dHGu4I1AFvBH01
=dnJN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Current thread:

BGP Exploit kwallace (May 03)
- Re: BGP Exploit Patrick W . Gilmore (May 03)
- Re: BGP Exploit Kurt Erik Lindqvist (May 04)
  - Re: BGP Exploit Steven M. Bellovin (May 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: BGP Exploit Smith, Donald (May 04)
  - Re: BGP Exploit james (May 04)
  - RE: BGP Exploit Stephen J. Wilcox (May 05)
- RE: BGP Exploit Smith, Donald (May 05)
- RE: BGP Exploit Smith, Donald (May 05)
  - Re: BGP Exploit Patrick W . Gilmore (May 05)
    - Re: BGP Exploit Christopher L. Morrow (May 05)
    - Re: BGP Exploit Patrick W . Gilmore (May 06)
    - Re: BGP Exploit Christopher L. Morrow (May 06)

(Thread continues...)