nanog mailing list archives

Re: What percentage of the Internet Traffic is junk?


From: "Wayne E. Bouchard" <web () typo org>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 11:45:24 -0700


It might be interesting to get a sense of percentages of traffic that
are "undesireable" (spam, DDOS, etc), "administrative" (logging, snmp,
rmon, etc), and "user traffic".

On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 01:35:09PM -0500, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:

William B. Norton wrote:

With all the spam, infected e-mails, DOS attacks, ultimately blackholed 
traffic, etc. I wonder if there has been a study that quantifies

What percentage of the Internet traffic is junk?

I don't know the answer in any case, but I would need a definition
for "Internet traffic" before I could even start.

Do we include the image and tabular date to and from the EROS
Data Center?  How about the radiographic images and resulting
"readings" (or what ever the correct term is) to and from the
hospital in Atkinson?  Credit card transactions at FDR?

I have a morbid fascination with weather so I am forever looking
at maps, satellite images, and all sorts of stuff that some people
tell me is a waste of my time, so I presume that is "junk"

What are we talking about?

-- 
Requiescas in pace o email

Ex turpi causa non oritur actio

http://members.cox.net/larrysheldon/


---
Wayne Bouchard
web () typo org
Network Dude
http://www.typo.org/~web/


Current thread: