![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: So, What Now, NANOG? Was: Request response [important]
From: "Joshua Brady" <jbrady () neoins com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:22:11 -0500
----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Golding" <dgolding () burtongroup com> To: "Brian Bruns" <bruns () 2mbit com>; <nanog () merit edu>; "Susan Harris" <srh () merit edu> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 11:11 AM Subject: So, What Now, NANOG? Was: Request response [important]
On 3/17/04 9:51 PM, "Brian Bruns" <bruns () 2mbit com> wrote:Erm, something is definately up tonight. Message is below, for those of you who didn't want to touch this message. I can't get to the site listed in the message, so I have no idea what its trying to deliver exactly. Anyone care to comment?Ok, so what's the answer to this? We can sit around all day analyzing these emails. It doesn't matter where they came from or who compromised which hosts - at this point, that's immaterial. At some point in the Internet's development, we could have had the FBI kick down the door of this guy and cart him away, and NANOG is safe once again. Not anymore - even if this guy is "reachable", there will be five others tomorrow, and ten others next week. I'm sure this is all over IRC by now. These issues, combined with the ever worsening S:N ratio on this list are destroying it. Some of the folks who have long been mainstays of the NANOG community don't even read it anymore. Its time to figure out what to do about this, employing a proactive stance. The answer is not "start a new mailing list". Names have power, as they say, and NANOG has the juice. So, a few simple proposals for people to chew over... 1) Turn on list moderation and recruit a corp of volunteer moderators. The FAQ volunteers did a good job, BTW. Dave Farber's IP list (not Internet Protocol, its Interesting People), is a good example of a low volume moderated list.
I vote for number 1 and volunteer my self to help moderate this hell hole err list.
If folks fear attack or retribution, please forward your comments to me and I'll anonimyze them before posting. Thanks! -- Daniel Golding Network and Telecommunications Strategies Burton Group
Joshua Brady
Current thread:
- Request response srh (Mar 17)
- Re: Request response Brian Bruns (Mar 17)
- Re: Request response Jonathan Nichols (Mar 17)
- So, What Now, NANOG? Was: Request response [important] Daniel Golding (Mar 18)
- Re: So, What Now, NANOG? Was: Request response [important] Joshua Brady (Mar 18)
- Re: So, What Now, NANOG? Was: Request response [important] Adam Rothschild (Mar 18)
- Re: So, What Now, NANOG? Was: Request response [important] william(at)elan.net (Mar 18)
- Re: Request response Brian Bruns (Mar 17)