nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamhaus Exposed
From: "Peter Galbavy" <peter.galbavy () knowtion net>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:35:02 -0000
Dave Howe wrote:
cause - which is *not* true in reverse, or for any other country. Up until recently, the US authorities would have had to make a case for extradition and/or arrest to a UK judge before the local plod would even be informed that there was an interest in the kid....
Not that recent, I believe the original "treaty" (a touch one sided for a treaty) was signed in 1998. Peter
Current thread:
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed, (continued)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed up (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Dave Howe (Mar 18)
- US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Joshua Brady (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Peter Galbavy (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Dave Howe (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) William Warren (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Henry Linneweh (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Jason Slagle (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Peter Galbavy (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Bill Woodcock (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed John Payne (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Peter Galbavy (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Sam Stickland (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Paul Jakma (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Jim Popovitch (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Paul Jakma (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Mar 18)
- Re: Tracing packets (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Andrew - Supernews (Mar 17)