nanog mailing list archives
Re: Enterprise Multihoming
From: Stephen Fisher <stephenfmail-nanog () yahoo com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:05:10 -0700
Most of the multi-homing talk has been about failover capabilities between different providers. What about the effects of multiple providers when neither has actually failed; such as different paths for inbound/outbound traffic. One provider may have better connectivity to x site whereas the other provider has better connectivity to y. (Or is this not as important as it used to be?) On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:15:55AM -0700, John Neiberger wrote:
In our case, we already are multihoming and I'm considering moving away from that to a simpler solution. It's been my assertion that we didn't need to multihome in the beginning. The decision was made at a level higher than me. However, now that we have it I'm trying to determine the pros and cons related to moving to a single provider.
Current thread:
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming, (continued)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Marshall Eubanks (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming E.B. Dreger (Mar 11)
- RE: Enterprise Multihoming McBurnett, Jim (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming John Neiberger (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming John Neiberger (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Steve Francis (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Rob Nelson (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming John Dupuy (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming John Neiberger (Mar 12)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Stephen Fisher (Mar 12)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 13)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Stephen Fisher (Mar 12)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming John Neiberger (Mar 12)
- RE: Enterprise Multihoming Burton, Chris (Mar 12)