nanog mailing list archives
Re: Enterprise Multihoming
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:31:52 +0200
E.B. Dreger wrote:
I´m refering to the most popular way of causing an IGP meltdown. Obviously there are other ways, like software defects to make your IGP go mad. But when your upstream´s IGP does that, you want to have provider B to switch over to. It probably has gotten better when the Internet has matured but a few years back when I was more involved in day-to-day operations it was a few times a year when excersizing this option was the best course of action.PH> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:21:03 +0200 PH> From: Petri Helenius PH> Depending on your requirements, the option of having somebody PH> redistribute all their BGP routes into ISIS or OSPF might not PH> worth looking forward to. Couldn't quite parse this, but it sounds scary.
Pete
Current thread:
- Enterprise Multihoming John Neiberger (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Daniel Roesen (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Jay Ford (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Crist Clark (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Arnold Nipper (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Petri Helenius (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming E.B. Dreger (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Petri Helenius (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming E.B. Dreger (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming E.B. Dreger (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Gregory Taylor (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Pekka Savola (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Marshall Eubanks (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Pekka Savola (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Scott McGrath (Mar 12)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Pekka Savola (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Mar 12)