nanog mailing list archives
Re: Enterprise Multihoming
From: "John Neiberger" <john.neiberger () efirstbank com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:10:17 -0700
Thanks to everyone who has responded so far. I'm glad that I got some opinions here before I proceeded. I also participate in another list that has some fairly experienced people on it. They prevailing opinion there was that multihoming to multiple providers was overrated and largely unnecessary, and they just about had me convinced. My current opinion is that since we can't accept much downtime in the case of a single provider failure, it's probably not wise to put all of our eggs in Sprint's basket even if all circuits are geographically diverse. Thanks again, John --
Current thread:
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming, (continued)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Marshall Eubanks (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Pekka Savola (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Scott McGrath (Mar 12)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming james (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Andrew Simmons (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 12)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Mar 12)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Howard C. Berkowitz (Mar 12)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming John Neiberger (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Owen DeLong (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming John Neiberger (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Marshall Eubanks (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming E.B. Dreger (Mar 11)
- RE: Enterprise Multihoming McBurnett, Jim (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming John Neiberger (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming John Neiberger (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Steve Francis (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Rob Nelson (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming John Dupuy (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming John Neiberger (Mar 12)