Re: UUNet Offer New Protection Against DDoS

[Steve Francis <steve () expertcity com>]

Christopher L. Morrow wrote:

> uRPF in the core seems like a bad plan, what with diverse routes and such.
> Loose-mode might help SOME, but really spoofing is such a low priority
> issue why make it a requirement? Customer triggered blackholing is a nice
> feature though.
>
>  
Obviously loose-mode. 
Spoofing may not be the current weapon of choice, but why not encourage 
the best net infrastructure?