nanog mailing list archives
RE: Overflow circuit
From: "Michel Py" <michel () arneill-py sacramento ca us>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:21:21 -0800
Alexei Roudnev wrote: VoIP over satellite? I am very sceptical about it. Better, forget such idea.
It works fine if the pipe is good enough (T1 class or better, what Joe's talking about). Latency although not nice is not the worst problem (which is jitter). In my experience aggressive QOS (priority queing) is required if you share the pipe with data. One day for the fun of it I even tried with DirectWay (el-cheapo consumer-grade satlink); for one line in the wee hours of the night it worked fine. Forget about it day-time though. But as long as you understand that your're not going to get VOIP over sat for 50 bucks a month and it's correctly configured you're fine. Michel.
Current thread:
- RE: Overflow circuit, (continued)
- RE: Overflow circuit Mailing List Subscriptions (Mar 27)
- Re: Overflow circuit Alex Rubenstein (Mar 27)
- Re: Overflow circuit Patrick Murphy (Mar 27)
- Re: Overflow circuit alex (Mar 28)
- RE: Overflow circuit Mailing List Subscriptions (Mar 27)
- Re: Overflow circuit Stephen Sprunk (Mar 28)
- RE: Overflow circuit Joe Chin (Mar 28)
- Re: Overflow circuit Alexei Roudnev (Mar 28)
- RE: Overflow circuit Joe Chin (Mar 28)
- RE: Overflow circuit Michel Py (Mar 26)
- Re: Overflow circuit W.D.McKinney (Mar 27)
- RE: Overflow circuit Michel Py (Mar 27)
- Re: Overflow circuit Alexei Roudnev (Mar 27)
- Re: Overflow circuit Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 27)
- Re: Overflow circuit Alexei Roudnev (Mar 27)
- Re: Overflow circuit Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 27)
- Re: Overflow circuit Rafi Sadowsky (Mar 27)
- Re: Overflow circuit Alexei Roudnev (Mar 27)
- RE: Overflow circuit Mailing List Subscriptions (Mar 28)
- Re: Overflow circuit Alexei Roudnev (Mar 27)