RE: [Fwd: [IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists]

[Curtis Maurand <curtis () maurand com>]

It won't make any difference.  Anyone (barring complete idiots) will 
encrypt the traffic with long keys.

Curtis

--
Curtis Maurand
mailto:curtis () maurand com
http://www.maurand.com


On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Hannigan, Martin wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of
> > Sean Donelan
> > Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 10:25 PM
> > To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP
> > Cc: Steven M. Bellovin; Jim Dempsey (E-mail); North American Noise and
> > Off-topic Gripes
> > Subject: RE: [Fwd: [IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists]
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP wrote:
>
> [SNIP]
>
>
> > A SPAN port could satisfy an ISP's obligations under
> > TitleIII/ECPA, but
> > not satisfy CALEA.
>
>
> What is required is TCAP information and bearer traffic. Typically
> delivered off the switch back to the LEA collector via a DS0. The
> TCAP information can be delivered in a multitude of ways.