nanog mailing list archives
Re: Postini, Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
From: "Edward B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 20:02:34 +0000 (GMT)
JN> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:56:11 -0600 JN> From: John Neiberger JN> Postini's patent issue (do a Google search to get more info) JN> is suspicious, and _possibly_ indicative of a slimy tactic. It does look pretty ridiculous. ETRN, formail, procmail, Web- based UIs, etc. have been around far longer than Postini. Heck, I was doing selective partial delivery in 1997 -- if a message was addressed to an important email address, "head -n" and pipe the output to a printer for paper-using staff to have. Eddy -- EverQuick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/ A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/ Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita _________________________________________________________________ DO NOT send mail to the following addresses: davidc () brics com -*- jfconmaapaq () intc net -*- sam () everquick net Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Current thread:
- Postini, Re: Verisign vs. ICANN John Neiberger (Jun 18)
- Re: Postini, Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Edward B. Dreger (Jun 18)
- Re: Postini, Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Ray Wong (Jun 18)
- Re: Postini, Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Edward B. Dreger (Jun 18)