nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
From: "william(at)elan.net" <william () elan net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:31:31 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Paul Vixie wrote:
Anything I/we can do to help the cause?not at the moment. i'm not a defendant, just a named co-conspirator.
Hah? Are they also naming individually all the dns operators that installed bind patch and specifically enabled it so that wildcards would not work? For that matter why don't they just name entire NANOG! I remember what a reaction there was on the list and 100% of those responding were purely negative of Verisign wildcards. -- William Leibzon Elan Networks william () elan net
Current thread:
- Verisign vs. ICANN Bob Martin (Jun 17)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Jeff Shultz (Jun 17)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Ariel Biener (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 17)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN william(at)elan.net (Jun 17)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Chris Yarnell (Jun 17)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 17)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Edward B. Dreger (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Edward B. Dreger (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Edward B. Dreger (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Edward B. Dreger (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Owen DeLong (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN william(at)elan.net (Jun 17)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Jeff Shultz (Jun 17)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Alexei Roudnev (Jun 19)