nanog mailing list archives
RE: "Default" Internet Service
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:03:32 -0700
Smith, Donald wrote: > First are the consumers willing to pay for a "safer" internet > DSL/dial/isdn? > Why should they have to?Because it costs money to mitigate the attacks coming from their infected machines. It takes people and people want to be paid. Given a larger security abuse team we could do more.
That's a reason abusers should have to pay cleanup fees. It's not a reason responsible or naive users should pay more for a safer internet unless they choose to. Owen -- If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably a forgery.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: "Default" Internet Service, (continued)
- Re: "Default" Internet Service Niels Bakker (Jun 14)
- Re: "Default" Internet Service Owen DeLong (Jun 14)
- Re: "Default" Internet Service william(at)elan.net (Jun 14)
- Re: "Default" Internet Service Owen DeLong (Jun 14)
- Re: "Default" Internet Service Matthew Sullivan (Jun 14)
- Re: "Default" Internet Service/Driver's License Susan Harris (Jun 15)
- Re: "Default" Internet Service/Driver's License Per Gregers Bilse (Jun 15)
- Re: "Default" Internet Service Edward B. Dreger (Jun 14)
- Re: "Default" Internet Service Matthew Sullivan (Jun 14)
- RE: "Default" Internet Service Owen DeLong (Jun 14)
- RE: "Default" Internet Service Randy Bush (Jun 14)
- RE: "Default" Internet Service Edward B. Dreger (Jun 14)
- Re: "Default" Internet Service Matthew Sullivan (Jun 14)