nanog mailing list archives
Re: AboveNet major backbone issues
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:12:30 +0000 (GMT)
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Randy Bush wrote:
it might be interesting to know how you determined this and what are "major worldwide backbone issues" in the sense of how they are defined and measured.Maybe they told him. :)damn. and i really meant my question. a lot of researchers are investing a lot of effort into recognizing and sizing major network problems from general/external evidence, e.g. route-views, traces, ippm measurements, ...
So, would RIPE's RIS project or some of the other route monitoring projects have noticed this as well? What is a 'major backbone outage' versus a peering link bounce from their perspective? Could they/should they monitor and report to some 'central' place when these larger events happen? What's the cutoff from 'minor' to 'major' event? -Chris
Current thread:
- AboveNet major backbone issues Edward Henigin (Jun 12)
- Re: AboveNet major backbone issues Randy Bush (Jun 12)
- Re: AboveNet major backbone issues Jon Lewis (Jun 12)
- Re: AboveNet major backbone issues Randy Bush (Jun 12)
- Re: AboveNet major backbone issues Christopher L. Morrow (Jun 12)
- RE: AboveNet major backbone issues K. Scott Bethke (Jun 12)
- Re: AboveNet major backbone issues Jon Lewis (Jun 12)
- Re: AboveNet major backbone issues Christopher L. Morrow (Jun 12)
- Re: AboveNet major backbone issues Randy Bush (Jun 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AboveNet major backbone issues Edward Henigin (Jun 12)
- Re: AboveNet major backbone issues Leo Bicknell (Jun 12)