nanog mailing list archives
Re: "zero day" exploit...?
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 06:33:54 +0000 (GMT)
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Matthew Sullivan wrote:
In case you haven't seen it... http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=117316298&eid=-255
yeah, yet another 'zero-day' (is it really zero-day with this?) IE hole :( So again, why would you want to use this? (yes sean, there are more holes in bind/sendmail/blah-unix-tool than ever in IE/Win*, but the market base causes the huge scope of the problem, eh?) oh well, block tcp/80 and tcp/443?
Current thread:
- "zero day" exploit...? Matthew Sullivan (Jun 08)
- Re: "zero day" exploit...? Christopher L. Morrow (Jun 08)
- Re: "zero day" exploit...? Sean Donelan (Jun 08)
- Re: "zero day" exploit...? Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 09)