nanog mailing list archives

Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses.


From: abuse () cabal org uk (Peter Corlett)
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:12:01 +0000 (UTC)


Stephen J. Wilcox <steve () telecomplete co uk> wrote:
[...]
I currently have a few .255/32s with Cisco and Foundry products and
have various windows/linux/OSX machines that access them without
problems..

Well, I'd expect Linux and OSX to do the right thing. It just seems to
be Windows that makes a complete sow's ear of it.

As to the IP addresses ending in 255 that are working from Windows
boxes, would I be right in guessing that the first octet of the IP
addresses in question is between 1 and 191?

-- 
PGP key ID E85DC776 - finger abuse () mooli org uk for full key


Current thread: