nanog mailing list archives
Re: ultradns reachability
From: Matt Ghali <mghali () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 17:55:13 -0700
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Leo Bicknell wrote:
So the question is not so much "is 500ms towards the server bad", it's "can I build a single server (cluster) that will take all the load worldwide when the client software does bad things."
DNS traffic, surprisingly, is not very "fat". It is no HTTP nor SMTP. The engineering behind appropriately sizing a unicast fallback would be pretty trivial, especially compared to building a somewhat-robust anycast architecture. matto
Current thread:
- Re: ultradns reachability, (continued)
- Re: ultradns reachability Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 01)
- Re: ultradns reachability Edward B. Dreger (Jul 01)
- Re: ultradns reachability Joe Abley (Jul 02)
- Re: ultradns reachability Leo Bicknell (Jul 02)
- Re: ultradns reachability Joe Abley (Jul 02)
- Re: ultradns reachability Leo Bicknell (Jul 02)
- Re: ultradns reachability Dr. Jeffrey Race (Jul 02)
- Re: ultradns reachability Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 02)
- Re: ultradns reachability Bill Woodcock (Jul 03)
- Re: ultradns reachability Leo Bicknell (Jul 03)