nanog mailing list archives
Re: that MIT paper again (Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net ) (longish)
From: Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg () ripe net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 10:19:47 +0200
On 23.07 22:30, Simon Waters wrote:
.... The abstract doesn't mention that the TTL on NS records is found to be important for scalability of the DNS. ....
Sic! And it is the *child* TTL that counts for most implementations.
Current thread:
- Re: that MIT paper again (Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net ) (longish) Simon Waters (Jul 23)
- Re: that MIT paper again (Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net ) (longish) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 23)
- Re: that MIT paper again (Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net ) (longish) Daniel Karrenberg (Jul 24)