nanog mailing list archives
Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:41:33 +0300
Paul Vixie wrote:
What would be your suggestion to achieve the desired effect that many seek by lower TTL's, which is changing A records to point to available, lower load servers at different times? I did read the point that lower TTL's should only be used when appropriate but if most high-traffic sites use low TTL's, the point about the rest is moot. (with the exception of the root-servers) The load will be seen on ISP resolvers, specially on consumer networks.so do i. but more importantly, i agree with daniel that the next thing that's going to happen as a result is that there will be pressure toward lower ttl's. and i further agree with daniel that lower ttl's would be bad. so, let's increase dynamicism of domain addition, but let's please not also increase dynamicism of delegation change and domain deletion.
Pete
Current thread:
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net, (continued)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Daniel Karrenberg (Jul 22)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Richard Cox (Jul 22)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Randy Bush (Jul 22)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Richard Cox (Jul 23)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Christian Kuhtz (Jul 23)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Daniel Senie (Jul 23)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jul 23)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net william(at)elan.net (Jul 22)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jul 22)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Petri Helenius (Jul 23)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Paul Vixie (Jul 23)