RE: 802.17 RPR and L2 Ethernet interoperablity (Ethernet over RPR)

[Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>]

On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Sam Stickland wrote:

> That was my worry - the definition of most. 99% of switches or 60%? This
> isn't actually a standard is it, so I presume this behaviour is expected,
> but not required?

The only way to make sure is to try, but with my (I guess) average insight
in ethernet headers I don't see how a double tagged packet would be
treated differently by a non Q-in-Q aware switch as long as there is no
MTU issue.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se