nanog mailing list archives
Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?]
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 18:25:57 +0200 (CEST)
On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, Randy Bush wrote:
no. in the first case, you're just hiding the incremental costs. eventually, some bean counter is gonna want to recover them, and then folk get quite unhappy.
What costs are you referring to? You basically need a few hours time per month from engineers and billing department. This for an exchange that has 20 ISPs connected to it. The amount of traffic isn't really a factor, but the one I know of and am part of running carries multi-gigabit. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?], (continued)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Edward B. Dreger (Jul 02)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] ren (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Bill Woodcock (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Randy Bush (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Randy Bush (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Randy Bush (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Randy Bush (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Joe Provo (Jul 05)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Jul 05)