nanog mailing list archives
Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my!
From: "Tom (UnitedLayer)" <tom () unitedlayer com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:03:10 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, bcm wrote:
But where to go? The Cisco GSR platform seems a logical choice, but their new 7600 series units are attractive for their cost.
7600's have all the craptacularity of 6500 switches, because thats what they are, I would reccomend against them. Buying GSR's is probably the right replacement for 7500's if you want to stick with Cisco.
Juniper may also have a place at this end of the processing spectrum. I'd also like to ensure that the new platform supports doing CAR and ACLs at line rate, given the client base.
Then you'll be wanting J boxes then, cuz Cisco doesn't do that very well from my experience.
Current thread:
- GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! bcm (Jan 06)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Jan 06)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 06)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Alex Rubenstein (Jan 06)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 06)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Randy Bush (Jan 06)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 06)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Robert Boyle (Jan 06)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Alex Rubenstein (Jan 06)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Neil J. McRae (Jan 07)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Dan Armstrong (Jan 06)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Neil J. McRae (Jan 07)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Scott McGrath (Jan 08)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Rob Healey (Jan 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Stong, Ian C. (Contractor) (Jan 06)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Michel Py (Jan 06)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 06)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Jeff Kell (Jan 06)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Rob Healey (Jan 07)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 06)