nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone?
From: ken emery <ken () cnet com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 23:52:56 -0800 (PST)
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Tomas Lund wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Brett Watson wrote:I was just having a hard time believing AT&T was leaking 10/8 and that any other large provider was accepting it so wanted to verify.Wasn't it established that they did infact not leak it but just routed it inside their own network?
This is not true. I am attached to 7018 and we saw 10/X routes. We are not AT&T. bye, ken emery
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone?, (continued)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Chris Adams (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Brett Watson (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Matt Levine (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? ken emery (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Matthew S. Hallacy (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? ken emery (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Sean Donelan (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Brett Watson (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Tomas Lund (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Brett Watson (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? ken emery (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Brett Watson (Jan 22)