nanog mailing list archives

Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath


From: Donovan Hill <lists () lazyeyez net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:41:52 -0800


On Tuesday 20 January 2004 04:16 pm, Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote:
Not all L3-switches are flow-based; prefix-based ones should do just fine.
Can people add/correct this initial list ?

Flow-based: Foundry with IronCore modules, Cisco Catalyst 6500 with Sup1(A)
Prefix-based: Foundry with JetCore modules, Cisco Catalyst 6500/7600 with
Sup2(A), Sup3(A/BXL)


Rubens


Where do the Extreme and Juniper fit into this?


----- Original Message -----
From: <haesu () towardex com>
To: "Brent Van Dussen" <vandusb () attens com>
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath

lesson learned:
stop using /makeshift/ layer3 switches (without naming vendor) to run
L3 core

-J

On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:22:52PM -0800, Brent Van Dussen wrote:
Well folks, since the middle of August I've been tracking the spread
and subsequent efforts by our community to stop the nachia/welchia
infection that took down so many networks.

Sadly, by my estimations, only about 20-30% of infected hosts were
cleaned.  After Jan 1, 2004 it appears that the thousands, (millions?)

of

remaining infected hosts were rebooted and the worm removed
itself.  Network traffic has finally returned to normal.

What kind of effects did everyone see from this devastating worm and

what

lessons did we learn for preventing network downtime in the future?

--
James Jun (formerly Haesu)
TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
1740 Massachusetts Ave.
Boxborough, MA 01719
Consulting, IPv4 & IPv6 colocation, web hosting, network design &

implementation

http://www.towardex.com  | james () towardex com
Cell: (978)394-2867      | Office: (978)263-3399 Ext. 170
Fax: (978)263-0033       | AIM: GigabitEthernet0
NOC: http://www.twdx.net | POC: HAESU-ARIN, HDJ1-6BONE

-- 
Donovan Hill
Electronics Engineering Technologist, CCNA
www.lazyeyez.net, www.gwsn.com


Current thread: