nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cable and Wireless Security Contact?
From: Richard Cox <Richard () mandarin com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 01:28:53 GMT
On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 07:40:38 +0800 someone claiming to be "Richard Cocks" <investigator () hellokitty com> wrote: {snip} For the record, neither that post, nor the earlier post which asserted a Sender name of "Hijacked-L" were from, or in any way authorised by me. I'm sure colleagues here are capable of header analysis, probably more so than I am, so I won't attempt to analyse them here, apart from this: nycmny1-ar7-4-46-056-062.nycmny1.elnk.dsl.genuity.net [4.46.56.62] dnsbl.njabl.org : BLOCKED [4.46.56.62] dnsbl.sorbs.net : BLOCKED -- Richard Cox
Current thread:
- Cable and Wireless Security Contact? Hijacked L (Jan 01)
- Re: Cable and Wireless Security Contact? Jim Shankland (Jan 01)
- Re: Cable and Wireless Security Contact? Daniel Roesen (Jan 02)
- Re: Cable and Wireless Security Contact? Paul (Jan 02)
- Re: Cable and Wireless Security Contact? Daniel Roesen (Jan 02)
- Re: Cable and Wireless Security Contact? Paul (Jan 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cable and Wireless Security Contact? Richard Cocks (Jan 04)
- Re: Cable and Wireless Security Contact? Paul (Jan 04)
- Re: Cable and Wireless Security Contact? Richard Cox (Jan 04)
- Re: Cable and Wireless Security Contact? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 04)
- Re: Cable and Wireless Security Contact? Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 04)