![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Good network sniffer?
From: "Alexei Roudnev" <alex () relcom net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:17:31 -0800
{tcpdump || snort - as a agents} + ethereal. Much better than $xx000 commercial sniffer(s) /I used both, and oput commercial system into the wastebucket after comparation/. Exception - if you need H.323, use commercial sniffers. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yann Berthier" <yb () sainte-barbe org> To: <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 3:51 PM Subject: Re: Good network sniffer?
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Kevin C Miller wrote:Tcprelay may get the replay portion of your question, <http://tcpreplay.sourceforge.net/>You can add netdude <http://netdude.sourceforge.net/>, along with ethereal and tcpreplay, and you will have a powerful solution to sniff and decode packets, and to edit and replay them at will. - yann
Current thread:
- Good network sniffer? Borger, Ben (Jan 12)
- Re: Good network sniffer? Erik Haagsman (Jan 12)
- Re: Good network sniffer? Joe Abley (Jan 12)
- Re: Good network sniffer? Andy Grosser (Jan 12)
- Re: Good network sniffer? Kevin C Miller (Jan 12)
- Re: Good network sniffer? Yann Berthier (Jan 12)
- Re: Good network sniffer? Alexei Roudnev (Jan 12)
- Re: Good network sniffer? Yann Berthier (Jan 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Good network sniffer? Braun, Mike (Jan 12)
- RE: Good network sniffer? doug (Jan 12)
- Re: Good network sniffer? Dr. Jeffrey Race (Jan 12)
- Re: Good network sniffer? Sean McPherson (Jan 13)
- Re: Good network sniffer? Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Jan 13)
- Re: Good network sniffer? Erik Haagsman (Jan 12)