nanog mailing list archives
Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my!
From: "Tom (UnitedLayer)" <tom () unitedlayer com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:57:00 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Florian Weimer wrote:
Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote:Buying GSR's is probably the right replacement for 7500's if you want to stick with Cisco.But be careful when buying the linecards. Not all of them have comparable forwarding performance to the 7500 if you do something else than mere IP packet fowarding (e.g. ACLs or policy-based routing).
Given that a GEIP in a 7500 can only do 200-300Mbps (packet load dependant), I hope the GSR can do better :) I have heard of instances where enabling inbound packet filtering or shaping on certain GigE cards would cause the cards to shutdown or reboot. I generally don't do shaping/etc on core gear, because its much easier to do it on my aggregation gear (2948G-L3/4908G-L3).
Current thread:
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my!, (continued)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! jlewis (Jan 07)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Jason Frisvold (Jan 07)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Tarko Tikan (Jan 07)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Christopher J. Wolff (Jan 07)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Tarko Tikan (Jan 07)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Jesper Skriver (Jan 12)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 12)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! David Schwartz (Jan 13)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Tarko Tikan (Jan 07)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! JC Dill (Jan 08)