nanog mailing list archives
RE: Proposal: De-boganising New Address Blocks
From: jlewis () lewis org
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 23:37:45 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Michel Py wrote:
Good idea, no contest. Now, the devil's advocate asks: what makes you think that operators/ISPs are going to react faster to your pilot stuff being bogonized than they would to real traffic being bogonized, as if it's a pilot project it's by definition not urgent and can wait tomorrow? Although I salute the effort, I am concerned that this will not change current reactive behavior which is to wait for the shit to hit the fan to update bogon lists. Might sound sad, but I think the way to
Assuming the pilot program does some form of reachability testing and then some effort is made to notify those with bad filters (good luck), then at least this notifies them before it's a real inconvenience for anyone. They may or may not choose to react, but at least this puts them on notice that they have a problem that will be real in the near future. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis () lewis org*| I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- Proposal: De-boganising New Address Blocks Daniel Karrenberg (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Proposal: De-boganising New Address Blocks Michel Py (Feb 24)
- RE: Proposal: De-boganising New Address Blocks jlewis (Feb 24)
- RE: Proposal: De-boganising New Address Blocks william(at)elan.net (Feb 24)
- RE: Proposal: De-boganising New Address Blocks jlewis (Feb 24)