nanog mailing list archives
RE: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea)
From: Alex Bligh <alex () alex org uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:20:53 +0000
--On 17 February 2004 16:10 -0600 "Chen, Weijing" <Weijing_Chen () labs sbc com> wrote:
Sound like an any to any end to end signaling/control mechanism with authentication capabilities. Smell fishy (packet version of dial tone?)
Since when had dialtone got end-to-end signalling/control? My POTS line doesn't run C7/SS7. I mean authentication as in scp (and not tftp). IE one end user authorizes the other end user, using whatever credentials they like. Alex
Current thread:
- RE: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Chen, Weijing (Feb 17)
- RE: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Alex Bligh (Feb 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Chen, Weijing (Feb 17)
- RE: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Alex Bligh (Feb 18)
- Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Michael . Dillon (Feb 18)
- Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Dr. Jeffrey Race (Feb 18)
- Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 19)