nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP - weight
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:46:09 -0500 (EST)
Dumb question: If I apply a equal weight to all our transit/peers, will that affect route announcements to iBGP or eBGP peers anyhow?
No it wont affect announcements, weight is local to the router you apply it.
We got a very simple setup: - 2 routers on the border to transit/peers (that's were i want to set the weight) - 1 edge router to customers - core router running BGP as well What I want to achieve is that traffic leaves through the border router it arrived, rather than have it bounced around.
eBGP should be preferred over iBGP anyhow assuming all other things are equal, if theyre not equal then either make them equal or you probably want to choose a different path anyhow (eg shorter as path). if you dont want any traffic to go across your network why bother meshing the ibgp in the first place?
We had some recent issues were it looks like the core got "out of sync" with the border (looks more like a sw issue than just convergence delay) and packets bounced back and forth between them. I know this doesn't solve the cause but the before digging for the initial reason I want a quick workaround.
hmm, i'd suggest emergency maintenance before doing some weird screwy stuff like that :) Steve
Current thread:
- BGP - weight Sven Huster (Feb 14)
- Re: BGP - weight Danny McPherson (Feb 14)
- Re: BGP - weight E.B. Dreger (Feb 14)
- Re: BGP - weight Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 14)
- Re: BGP - weight Sven Huster (Feb 14)
- Re: BGP - weight Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 14)
- Re: BGP - weight Sven Huster (Feb 14)
- Re: BGP - weight E.B. Dreger (Feb 14)
- Re: BGP - weight Sven Huster (Feb 15)
- Re: BGP - weight E.B. Dreger (Feb 15)
- Re: BGP - weight Sven Huster (Feb 18)
- Re: BGP - weight Sven Huster (Feb 14)