nanog mailing list archives
Re: Root Servers Request
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:18:37 -0500
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:03:52 EST, "Stephen J. Wilcox" said:
Also, if you spend some time thinking about this you will soon realise that its a bad idea for one organisation to control the roots. In fact it works nicely if you find 13 different organisations.
I'll overlook the additional fact that the actual root nameservers are being run in a way that anybody who believes in RFC2826 is, in general, fairly happy with (modulo the occasional RFC2870 issue). Most of the complaints seem centered around the management of the servers [a-m].gtld-servers.net, which is a totally different beast.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Root Servers Request, (continued)
- Re: Root Servers Request Philip J. Nesser II (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Donovan Hill (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Todd Vierling (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Deepak Jain (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request bill (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Todd Vierling (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Paul Vixie (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Donovan Hill (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Paul Vixie (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 10)
- Re: Root Servers Request Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 10)
- Re: Root^H^H^H^HGTLD Servers Request Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 10)
- Re: Root^H^H^H^HGTLD Servers Request Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 10)
- Re: Root Servers Request Donovan Hill (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Philip J. Nesser II (Feb 09)