nanog mailing list archives
Re: question on ptr rr
From: Arnold Nipper <arnold () nipper de>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:13:53 +0100
On 09.02.2004 17:59 Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 10:38:20 GMT, Michael.Dillon () radianz com said:Imagine a world in which only ISPs run SMTP servers which only talk directly to other servers with which they have an offline relationship.70K user. 40M .coms. N*M. Gee thanks. That's too damned many relationships to negotiate. And I think we learned our lesson with 'ADMD= PRMD=', didn't we?
Moreover: which ISP would take responsibility that the email is delivered properly to the destination. Today all ISP just do best-effort.
This model won't work ... Arnold
Current thread:
- Re: question on ptr rr, (continued)
- Re: question on ptr rr Chris Adams (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Andrew - Supernews (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Lou Katz (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Niels Bakker (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Daniel Senie (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Randy Bush (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Arnold Nipper (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Feb 09)